Skill Check - Revision history

imported>Tlosk: /* Example */

2013-04-21T11:59:30Z

Example

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:59, 21 April 2013
(No difference)

imported>Tlosk: /* Example */

2013-04-21T11:59:30Z

Example

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 21 April 2013
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Using this formula for a skill check of 500 generates the following chances of success:		Using this formula for a skill check of 500 generates the following chances of success:

	{{~~SkillCheck500~~}}		{{SkillCheck\|500}}

	You can easily generate success %s for any specific skill level using a spreadsheet by putting the skill level into cell A1, the difficulty in cell A2, and inserting the following formula into cell A3:		You can easily generate success %s for any specific skill level using a spreadsheet by putting the skill level into cell A1, the difficulty in cell A2, and inserting the following formula into cell A3:

imported>Tlosk at 23:15, 24 February 2013

2013-02-24T23:15:47Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:15, 24 February 2013
(No difference)

imported>Tlosk at 23:15, 24 February 2013

2013-02-24T23:15:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 24 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Success = 1 - 1 / (1 + exp(0.03 * (Attack - Defense))		Success = 1 - 1 / (1 + exp(0.03 * (Attack - Defense))

			where "exp" returns e raised to the power of the number that follows, the constant e equals 2.71828182845904, the base of the natural logarithm. EXP is a standard function for both Microsoft Excel and LibreOffice.

	From http://www.calloffate.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=191&PID=29738 :		From http://www.calloffate.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=191&PID=29738 :

	Answer: srand - Casting spells uses a slightly different skill check curve than that used for all other skill checks. It has the same midpoint, but is steeper through the middle. So once you are over the 50/50 point, your casting gets reliable much faster than with a normal skill check curve. But conversely, under the 50/50 point your casting is much less reliable than with the normal skill check curve. I just found this out tonight, myself.		Answer: srand - Casting spells uses a slightly different skill check curve than that used for all other skill checks. It has the same midpoint, but is steeper through the middle. So once you are over the 50/50 point, your casting gets reliable much faster than with a normal skill check curve. But conversely, under the 50/50 point your casting is much less reliable than with the normal skill check curve. I just found this out tonight, myself.

			== Example ==
			Using this formula for a skill check of 500 generates the following chances of success:

			{{SkillCheck500}}

			You can easily generate success %s for any specific skill level using a spreadsheet by putting the skill level into cell A1, the difficulty in cell A2, and inserting the following formula into cell A3:

			<pre>
			=1 - 1 / (1 + EXP(0.03 * (A1 - A2)))
			</pre>

	[[Category:Game Mechanic]]		[[Category:Game Mechanic]]

imported>Arkalor at 00:34, 22 August 2012

2012-08-22T00:34:51Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:34, 22 August 2012
(No difference)

imported>Arkalor at 00:34, 22 August 2012

2012-08-22T00:34:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 22 August 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Answer: srand - Casting spells uses a slightly different skill check curve than that used for all other skill checks. It has the same midpoint, but is steeper through the middle. So once you are over the 50/50 point, your casting gets reliable much faster than with a normal skill check curve. But conversely, under the 50/50 point your casting is much less reliable than with the normal skill check curve. I just found this out tonight, myself.		Answer: srand - Casting spells uses a slightly different skill check curve than that used for all other skill checks. It has the same midpoint, but is steeper through the middle. So once you are over the 50/50 point, your casting gets reliable much faster than with a normal skill check curve. But conversely, under the 50/50 point your casting is much less reliable than with the normal skill check curve. I just found this out tonight, myself.

			[[Category:Game Mechanic]]
	[[Category:Game ~~Concept~~]]

imported>Widgeon at 13:32, 2 April 2009

2009-04-02T13:32:02Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:32, 2 April 2009
(No difference)

imported>Widgeon at 13:32, 2 April 2009

2009-04-02T13:32:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:32, 2 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Success = 1 - 1 / (1 + exp(0.03 * (Attack - Defense))		Success = 1 - 1 / (1 + exp(0.03 * (Attack - Defense))

			From http://www.calloffate.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=191&PID=29738 :

			Answer: srand - Casting spells uses a slightly different skill check curve than that used for all other skill checks. It has the same midpoint, but is steeper through the middle. So once you are over the 50/50 point, your casting gets reliable much faster than with a normal skill check curve. But conversely, under the 50/50 point your casting is much less reliable than with the normal skill check curve. I just found this out tonight, myself.


	[[Category:Game Concept]]		[[Category:Game Concept]]

imported>Widgeon: New page: Success = 1 - 1 / (1 + exp(0.03 * (Attack - Defense)) Category:Game Concept

2008-07-30T15:56:32Z

New page: Success = 1 - 1 / (1 + exp(0.03 * (Attack - Defense)) Category:Game Concept

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:56, 30 July 2008
(No difference)

imported>Widgeon: New page: Success = 1 - 1 / (1 + exp(0.03 * (Attack - Defense)) Category:Game Concept

2008-07-30T15:56:32Z

New page: Success = 1 - 1 / (1 + exp(0.03 * (Attack - Defense)) Category:Game Concept

New page

Success = 1 - 1 / (1 + exp(0.03 * (Attack - Defense))

[[Category:Game Concept]]