Talk:Locations - Revision history

imported>An Adventurer at 23:20, 27 February 2008

2008-02-27T23:20:14Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:20, 27 February 2008
(No difference)

imported>An Adventurer at 23:20, 27 February 2008

2008-02-27T23:20:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, 27 February 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Yeah, there are still many sections from when the wiki was first created that are a little messy. Feel free to clean up the location section however you see fit.

			One thing I would eventually like to have in the location section is a list of every point of interest, things like the shore armoredillo cove east of arwic, static spawns of mire wasps in the blackmire swamp, etc. That way, when you go to creature's page and click "what links here" it will not only list all the dungeons they spawn in, but any static landscape spawns. The problem will be coming up with a good naming system. Each POI will need its own unique page in order for the "what links here" thing to work.

			--[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 17:20, 27 February 2008 (CST)
			----


	--[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 05:16, 27 February 2008 (CST) There is a lot of overlap between the categories landmasses and geographic regions, with the latter being more inclusive so perhaps it would be better to collapse the two.		--[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 05:16, 27 February 2008 (CST) There is a lot of overlap between the categories landmasses and geographic regions, with the latter being more inclusive so perhaps it would be better to collapse the two.

imported>Tlosk at 11:16, 27 February 2008

2008-02-27T11:16:55Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:16, 27 February 2008
(No difference)

imported>Tlosk at 11:16, 27 February 2008

2008-02-27T11:16:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 27 February 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	There is a lot of overlap between the categories landmasses and geographic regions, with the latter being more inclusive so perhaps it would be better to collapse the two.		--[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 05:16, 27 February 2008 (CST) There is a lot of overlap between the categories landmasses and geographic regions, with the latter being more inclusive so perhaps it would be better to collapse the two.

imported>Tlosk: New page: There is a lot of overlap between the categories landmasses and geographic regions, with the latter being more inclusive so perhaps it would be better to collapse the two.

2008-02-27T11:16:41Z

New page: There is a lot of overlap between the categories landmasses and geographic regions, with the latter being more inclusive so perhaps it would be better to collapse the two.

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:16, 27 February 2008
(No difference)

imported>Tlosk: New page: There is a lot of overlap between the categories landmasses and geographic regions, with the latter being more inclusive so perhaps it would be better to collapse the two.

2008-02-27T11:16:41Z

New page: There is a lot of overlap between the categories landmasses and geographic regions, with the latter being more inclusive so perhaps it would be better to collapse the two.

New page

There is a lot of overlap between the categories landmasses and geographic regions, with the latter being more inclusive so perhaps it would be better to collapse the two.