Talk:Spell Research - Revision history

imported>Tlosk at 17:54, 12 December 2008

2008-12-12T17:54:56Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:54, 12 December 2008
(No difference)

imported>Tlosk at 17:54, 12 December 2008

2008-12-12T17:54:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:54, 12 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Inscription of Nullify Item Magic fixed, scroll made is now VIII instead of VI. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 11:54, 12 December 2008 (CST)

			----

			Here are some guesses on what may or may not be in game, now or perhaps sometime later:
			* Incantation of Armor Self
			* Incantation of Enfeeble Other
			* Incantation of Imperil Other
			* Incantation of Mana Boost Other
			* Incantation of Blood Drinker
			* Incantation of Blood Loather
			* Incantation of Hermetic Void
			* Incantation of Lure Blade
			* Incantation of Spirit Drinker
			* Incantation of Spirit Loather
			* Incantation of Turn Blade
			* Incantation of Martyr's Hecatomb
			* Incantation of Martyr's Blight
			* Incantation of Martyr's Tenacity
			* Incantation of Nuhmudira's Wisdom
			* Incantation of Nuhmudira Enlightenment
			* Incantation of Magic Item Tinkering Expertise Self
			* Incantation of Health to Mana Self
			* Incantation of Health to Stamina Self
			* Incantation of Infuse Health Other
			* Incantation of Infuse Mana Other
			* Incantation of Infuse Stamina Other
			* Incantation of Mana to Health Self
			* Incantation of Mana to Stamina Other
			* Incantation of Mana to Stamina Self
			* Incantation of Stamina to Health Other
			* Incantation of Stamina to Health Self
			* Incantation of Stamina to Mana Other
			--[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 11:54, 12 December 2008 (CST)
			----

	I like that idea, however I think we could keep them here until the lists are complete (while we are compiling them), then move then once complete. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 17:10, 14 October 2008 (CDT)		I like that idea, however I think we could keep them here until the lists are complete (while we are compiling them), then move then once complete. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 17:10, 14 October 2008 (CDT)

imported>Tlosk at 22:10, 14 October 2008

2008-10-14T22:10:11Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:10, 14 October 2008
(No difference)

imported>Tlosk at 22:10, 14 October 2008

2008-10-14T22:10:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 14 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			I like that idea, however I think we could keep them here until the lists are complete (while we are compiling them), then move then once complete. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 17:10, 14 October 2008 (CDT)

			----

	Do you think we should move the spell lists to their own pages and just link to them from the spell research page? --[[User:Atarax\|Atarax]]		Do you think we should move the spell lists to their own pages and just link to them from the spell research page? --[[User:Atarax\|Atarax]]

Line 47:		Line 51:

	Also, the devs have said in the release notes that there are no level 8 vulns, imperil, or defender. Those spells are not possible to learn. -Konnir		Also, the devs have said in the release notes that there are no level 8 vulns, imperil, or defender. Those spells are not possible to learn. -Konnir


			----

			Temp

			190 - 0 3 2 50bu Chalice

imported>Atarax at 17:09, 10 October 2008

2008-10-10T17:09:19Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:09, 10 October 2008
(No difference)

imported>Atarax at 17:09, 10 October 2008

2008-10-10T17:09:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 10 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Do you think we should move the spell lists to their own pages and just link to them from the spell research page? --[[User:Atarax\|Atarax]]

			----

	Added a table so don't have to the math on every chest, can just look it up. I've found chests with just 3 comps, 4 comps, and 5 comps, so I included all the possible values. Of course it's always possible a combo with a weapon etc item can have the same burden, but 99% of the time will be just the comps. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 17:02, 1 October 2008 (CDT)		Added a table so don't have to the math on every chest, can just look it up. I've found chests with just 3 comps, 4 comps, and 5 comps, so I included all the possible values. Of course it's always possible a combo with a weapon etc item can have the same burden, but 99% of the time will be just the comps. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 17:02, 1 October 2008 (CDT)

imported>Tlosk at 22:02, 1 October 2008

2008-10-01T22:02:09Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:02, 1 October 2008
(No difference)

imported>Tlosk at 22:02, 1 October 2008

2008-10-01T22:02:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 1 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Added a table so don't have to the math on every chest, can just look it up. I've found chests with just 3 comps, 4 comps, and 5 comps, so I included all the possible values. Of course it's always possible a combo with a weapon etc item can have the same burden, but 99% of the time will be just the comps. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 17:02, 1 October 2008 (CDT)

			----

	That's a good point, we should be more specific than just skills since there are differences in how they combine in some cases. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 16:18, 1 October 2008 (CDT)		That's a good point, we should be more specific than just skills since there are differences in how they combine in some cases. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 16:18, 1 October 2008 (CDT)

imported>Tlosk at 21:18, 1 October 2008

2008-10-01T21:18:09Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:18, 1 October 2008
(No difference)

imported>Tlosk at 21:18, 1 October 2008

2008-10-01T21:18:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 1 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			That's a good point, we should be more specific than just skills since there are differences in how they combine in some cases. --[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 16:18, 1 October 2008 (CDT)

			----

	I changed "benevolence + nullification != (skill)" to "benevolence + nullification != (non-magic school skill)" since it is ambiguous. It seems likely that magic school glyphs are used here, and unless someone has actually tried it we should be clear that it hasn't been tested.		I changed "benevolence + nullification != (skill)" to "benevolence + nullification != (non-magic school skill)" since it is ambiguous. It seems likely that magic school glyphs are used here, and unless someone has actually tried it we should be clear that it hasn't been tested.
	--[[User:Virindi\|Virindi]]		--[[User:Virindi\|Virindi]]