Forum:Creature/NPC pages and lore: Difference between revisions
imported>Tlosk's Bot m (Created page with '{{Forumheader|General}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> {{Post | Indent = : | To = | Text = I've been wo…') |
imported>Tlosk's Bot m (Created page with '{{Forumheader|General}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> {{Post | Indent = : | To = | Text = I've been wo…') |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 16:04, 15 October 2009
I've been wondering if we should handle pages for lore and in-game information differently. Currently the rule is that if for example an NPC/Monster is also a notable lore character, the lore character description would go on the same page as the in-game stats. I think this might be better if the main page is a disambiguation.
For Example, the Lady Aerfalle would look like this:
See:
- Lady Aerfalle (Level 300 Creature)
- Lady Aerfalle (Level 135 NPC)
- Lady Aerfalle (Level 135 Creature)
- Lady Aerfalle (Level 95 Creature)
- Lady Aerfalle (Character)
- Aerfalle's Weakened Apprentice
- Aerfalle's Apprentice
There would be similar pages for other notable characters like Asheron, Borelean, Elysa, Nummy, Rytheran, etc.
I also think it could be useful to split creature class pages up into stats and lore. While some creatures may not have a lot of lore, others like Shadow, Virindi, Tumerok, Lugian, Burun, and Undead have tons of information, and certainly deserve their own "Heritage" page, like those I've been working on for Isparians and Empyeans (see: Sho and Falatacot)
As for how to split up creature class pages, I would suggest leaving the current ones in place as the stat page since they are linked to the most, and the first place someone would search for when looking for stats. On those pages we would place a link to the lore page. It could be something simple like Drudge Lore or Drudge Bestiary Entry.
Thoughts?
--An Adventurer 16:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree that'd be a good way to handle creatures with multiple versions. For the creature class pages, I'd suggest that since an abundance of lore is the exception, we keep the layout as is, however for those few types with more than 2 or 3 paragraphs of lore, to have 2-3 paragraphs of abbreviated lore on the class page with a link to an additional page where the lore is expanded as you suggest. My preference would be with [[<Creature Class> Lore]]. Besides the frequency issue (maybe 10 of the 70+ classes have lots of lore available) it's also because of layout concerns, the ToC and image would cramp the table without the text there. --Tlosk 17:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
I've completed the Aerfalle changes. Please see Lady Aerfalle. Feedback anyone? --An Adventurer 20:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)