Talk:Ancient Powers: Difference between revisions
imported>An Adventurer mNo edit summary |
imported>Tlosk No edit summary |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sure, I finished formatting the Adept quests this morning and was moving on to the Initiate ones, I'll roll the initiation ones into a single page. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 17:38, 15 September 2008 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
didn't see your idea till just now. Dev comment page sounds fine. | |||
I have a suggestion. I think we should merge the 3 society initiation quests into 1. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 09:34, 15 September 2008 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
If there are no objections I'm going to make a supplementary patch page (not to be a regular thing, just this time, similar to how we made a preview page for the patch, for developer comments. This way we can get them all in and use a ToC to give an easier way to step through them or find ones of interest. There are so may important ones this month that it's making it unwieldy on the patch page itself. I was thinking of just calling it [[Ancient Powers - Developer Comments]], and linking to it from here. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 07:06, 12 September 2008 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
I agree Tlosk. Once we actually get the quest, perhaps another name can be given to it too... something like Adept's Trial would be easier to remember. | |||
By the way, is the rock near the top of Vaeshok's cave new? It says something when you use it. --[[User:Widgeon|Widgeon]] 00:03, 2 September 2008 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
I think the Lens quest might better be listed at the Initiate Level, not Adept, as I understand it it will be the quest you do as an Initiate, as your last quest to meet the requirements to advance to Adept status. The remaining requirement being ribbons turned in. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 08:39, 1 September 2008 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
Yeah, I'd rather do one page for each set of three. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 16:15, 27 August 2008 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
So I'm guessing each stronghold has the same generic '''Society <Type> Armorsmith'''? What should we do with them? First option, give them all a page, with (<Society>) in the title. Second, have all 3 of each type share the page. 3rd, have each NPC Name (Society Sollerets Armorsmith, etc) redirect to a page called '''Society Armorsmiths''' with all information contained here. I personally like the 3rd option the best. They are pretty generic NPCs, so its not like we need all the regular information about each individual one. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 15:56, 27 August 2008 (CDT) | So I'm guessing each stronghold has the same generic '''Society <Type> Armorsmith'''? What should we do with them? First option, give them all a page, with (<Society>) in the title. Second, have all 3 of each type share the page. 3rd, have each NPC Name (Society Sollerets Armorsmith, etc) redirect to a page called '''Society Armorsmiths''' with all information contained here. I personally like the 3rd option the best. They are pretty generic NPCs, so its not like we need all the regular information about each individual one. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 15:56, 27 August 2008 (CDT) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Latest revision as of 22:38, 15 September 2008
Sure, I finished formatting the Adept quests this morning and was moving on to the Initiate ones, I'll roll the initiation ones into a single page. --Tlosk 17:38, 15 September 2008 (CDT)
didn't see your idea till just now. Dev comment page sounds fine.
I have a suggestion. I think we should merge the 3 society initiation quests into 1. --An Adventurer 09:34, 15 September 2008 (CDT)
If there are no objections I'm going to make a supplementary patch page (not to be a regular thing, just this time, similar to how we made a preview page for the patch, for developer comments. This way we can get them all in and use a ToC to give an easier way to step through them or find ones of interest. There are so may important ones this month that it's making it unwieldy on the patch page itself. I was thinking of just calling it Ancient Powers - Developer Comments, and linking to it from here. --Tlosk 07:06, 12 September 2008 (CDT)
I agree Tlosk. Once we actually get the quest, perhaps another name can be given to it too... something like Adept's Trial would be easier to remember.
By the way, is the rock near the top of Vaeshok's cave new? It says something when you use it. --Widgeon 00:03, 2 September 2008 (CDT)
I think the Lens quest might better be listed at the Initiate Level, not Adept, as I understand it it will be the quest you do as an Initiate, as your last quest to meet the requirements to advance to Adept status. The remaining requirement being ribbons turned in. --Tlosk 08:39, 1 September 2008 (CDT)
Yeah, I'd rather do one page for each set of three. --Tlosk 16:15, 27 August 2008 (CDT)
So I'm guessing each stronghold has the same generic Society <Type> Armorsmith? What should we do with them? First option, give them all a page, with (<Society>) in the title. Second, have all 3 of each type share the page. 3rd, have each NPC Name (Society Sollerets Armorsmith, etc) redirect to a page called Society Armorsmiths with all information contained here. I personally like the 3rd option the best. They are pretty generic NPCs, so its not like we need all the regular information about each individual one. --An Adventurer 15:56, 27 August 2008 (CDT)
Yeah it's new. --Tlosk 15:26, 27 August 2008 (CDT)
Is the Ancient Cloister dungeon at 82.7S 96.1E new? 150+, quest flag required to enter. --Widgeon 11:33, 27 August 2008 (CDT)
There are a number of items, NPCs, and quests that are the same for all three factions. Where it makes sense, either have the description faction neutral, or add sections detailing specifics for each faction if they are different. --Tlosk 23:10, 26 August 2008 (CDT)