Talk:Shopkeeper NPC Template: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Tlosk No edit summary |
imported>Tlosk No edit summary |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
|} | |||
{|cellpadding=4 border=0 | |||
|-valign=top | |||
| | |||
{|cellpadding=3 style=" border:1px solid #e5e5e5; background:#f9f9f9; vertical-align:top;" | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=2 bgcolor=#d0d0d0 align=center valign=top| '''Spell Components''' | |||
|bgcolor=#d0d0d0 align=center valign=top| '''Pyreals''' | |||
|- | |||
|align=left| [[Image:Gold Scarab Icon.png]] | |||
|align=left| [[Gold Scarab]] | |||
|align=right| 500 | |||
|- | |||
|align=left| [[Image:Pyreal Scarab Icon.png]] | |||
|align=left| [[Pyreal Scarab]] | |||
|align=right| 1,000 | |||
|- | |||
|align=left| [[Image:Platinum Scarab Icon.png]] | |||
|align=left| [[Platinum Scarab]] | |||
|align=right| 40,000 | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=2 bgcolor=#d0d0d0 align=center valign=top| '''Keys, Tools''' | |||
|bgcolor=#d0d0d0 align=center valign=top| '''Pyreals''' | |||
|- | |||
|align=left| [[Image:Plain Lockpick Icon.png]] | |||
|align=left| [[Plain Lockpick]] | |||
|align=right| 200 | |||
|- | |||
|align=left| [[Image:Reliable Lockpick Icon.png]] | |||
|align=left| [[Reliable Lockpick]] | |||
|align=right| 400 | |||
|- | |||
|align=left| [[Image:Good Lockpick Icon.png]] | |||
|align=left| [[Good Lockpick]] | |||
|align=right| 675 | |||
|- | |||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 22:45, 7 March 2009
I'm not a big fan of how the inventory is laid out, more specifically, how the prices are displayed, i.e. 1amc. Do you guys think we could have a section above the inventory that shows "currency", and then possibly a table below, similar to the XP rewards table, which shows "Items", "Price". This way we could just show the price without the currency next to it, keep everything in uniform line (throughout categories), and also allow for sorting. It may be overkill, but what do you guys think? I'll try to work up an example. --Atarax 12:22, 6 March 2009 (CST)
- I feel the same, I think that would look better, though the sorting can be tricky.--Tlosk 15:59, 7 March 2009 (CST)
|
|
|
|