User talk:An Adventurer: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Tlosk No edit summary |
imported>Tlosk No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi, you may have missed it in the discussion but the reason for retaining the link in the section heading was to have the current link there. Of course for recent posts, the current and the original will be the same, or a duplication. But for older pages before the redesign in august they will be different. Do you think instead we should just list all three below? Or should we retain the prominent current link in the heading? The only reason I kept the old link in heading was because of redirects from other pages, but it shouldn't be hard to find those with the right search. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 05:28, 11 December 2008 (CST) | Hi, you may have missed it in the discussion but the reason for retaining the link in the section heading was to have the current link there. Of course for recent posts, the current and the original will be the same, or a duplication. But for older pages before the redesign in august they will be different. Do you think instead we should just list all three below? Or should we retain the prominent current link in the heading? The only reason I kept the old link in heading was because of redirects from other pages, but it shouldn't be hard to find those with the right search. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 05:28, 11 December 2008 (CST) | ||
Maybe to make it nice and clean we could just use a list of aliased links like this? | |||
* [http://ac.turbine.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=425-sins-of-the-fathers&catid=74-2008 Current Link] | |||
* [http://ac.turbine.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=425-sins-of-the-fathers&catid=74-2008 Original Link] | |||
* [[Announcements - 2008/12 - Sins of the Fathers#Teaser|Wiki Archive]] | |||
--[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 05:40, 11 December 2008 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 11:40, 11 December 2008
Hi, you may have missed it in the discussion but the reason for retaining the link in the section heading was to have the current link there. Of course for recent posts, the current and the original will be the same, or a duplication. But for older pages before the redesign in august they will be different. Do you think instead we should just list all three below? Or should we retain the prominent current link in the heading? The only reason I kept the old link in heading was because of redirects from other pages, but it shouldn't be hard to find those with the right search. --Tlosk 05:28, 11 December 2008 (CST)
Maybe to make it nice and clean we could just use a list of aliased links like this?
--Tlosk 05:40, 11 December 2008 (CST)