User talk:An Adventurer: Difference between revisions

From My Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Tlosk
mNo edit summary
imported>Atarax
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


* [[Template talk:Map Point Plus#Number of Points]] --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 10:36, 24 January 2009 (CST)
* [[Template talk:Map Point Plus#Number of Points]] --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 10:36, 24 January 2009 (CST)
----
What do you think about redirecting all the spells from [[Item Sets]] to their appropriate cantrip?  For example, the [[Wise Set]].  It basically casts focus/willpower cantrips.  Should we redirect them to the [[Focus (Cantrip)]] and [[Willpower (Cantrip)]] sets so that we can show the stacking properly?

Revision as of 17:21, 28 January 2009

Or leave a message below:


I added all the dispels to the sandbox, and also finished off the positive redirects. You might want to double check that it looks right, but I think the dispels will fit in nicely with your redirect format. --Atarax 11:21, 9 January 2009 (CST)


All the positive/negative spell redirects are done. Are we going to include monster spells into the spell stacking for negative others? Like Weight of the World for example. It would be nice to see all the debuffs in one table, even they aren't castable. Either that or have a link to monster related debuffs on the negative strength spell. Now on to cantrips. They will be tough since there are so many quest spells and items that affect skills and protections. I did some of the basics for life magic and creature attributes, but that's just the tip of the iceberg. We'll need a template to effectively track cantrip stacking. --Atarax 12:18, 21 January 2009 (CST)



What do you think about redirecting all the spells from Item Sets to their appropriate cantrip? For example, the Wise Set. It basically casts focus/willpower cantrips. Should we redirect them to the Focus (Cantrip) and Willpower (Cantrip) sets so that we can show the stacking properly?