User talk:Darkmurkrow: Difference between revisions
imported>Sucamarto No edit summary |
imported>Sucamarto |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Template:Quest Summary == | == Template:Quest Summary == | ||
Think we should add a new parameter to [[:Template:Quest Summary]] for MMD reward? Seems like most quests will need to list it now. --[[User:Darkmurkrow|Darkmurkrow]] ([[User talk:Darkmurkrow|talk]]) 19:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC) | Think we should add a new parameter to [[:Template:Quest Summary]] for MMD reward? Seems like most quests will need to list it now. --[[User:Darkmurkrow|Darkmurkrow]] ([[User talk:Darkmurkrow|talk]]) 19:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)<br> | ||
--- <b>Sounds good to me</b> | --- <b>Sounds good to me</b> | ||
Revision as of 22:13, 10 October 2013
- Suca - Turbine usually seems to release the contracts a month after the actual quest gets released, I try and use the dungeon name if one exists, otherwise I use the contract if it one exists at time the dungeon is released. Take this month as an example, there is no Contract for it http://acpedia.org/wiki/Presk%27s_Bunker_Quest so i used the dungeon name.
Agreed. The contracts are typically 1-2 months behind the quest release and I think the names given by the page creators are fine. My question is more should the policy be to switch the official page name to be the contract name once the contract is released or just add the contract name as a redirect? Seems like the "official" name from the contract would make more sense, as not everyone in game uses the wiki. --Darkmurkrow (talk) 00:18, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
I'd say use a redirect from actual contract name to used name would be fine.
Template:Quest Summary
Think we should add a new parameter to Template:Quest Summary for MMD reward? Seems like most quests will need to list it now. --Darkmurkrow (talk) 19:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
--- Sounds good to me